Dec
1

Porn + wedding rings = Christian Porn

By Kelsey

A while back I was trying to think of a name for a Christian porn magazine.  I know; it’s a weird way to spend a Sunday.

I was making fun of myself for starting a pitch to a Christian magazine with this sentence: “I slept with the prophetess.” (I actually just spent the night at her house.) At the time I hadn’t heard back from the magazine and figured that the opening would have probably been better suited for a Christian porn magazine.  That’s why my mind went there.  As it turns out, they published the story I pitched a few months later.

I eventually settled on Porn-Again Christian as the title for my fake magazine, but not before stumbling upon some sites advocating for Christian porn. Apparently it exists.  I did a post mocking Christian porn and, as of today, 12,808 people have searched for “christian porn” and found my site.

Lord, held me.

To me christian porn (porn with married couples with wedding rings visible) seems pretty hypocritical and shouldn’t be blended together. I joked in the original post: “What do Christians and Larry Flint have in common? They are both offended by Christian Porn.”

The consensus among the commenters of the post seemed to be that Christian porn kinda went against the whole “covet thy neighbor’s wife” and lust is a deadly sin things. A few commenters have left interesting comments, defending Christian sex, but not defending Christian porn. (Note: I wasn’t attacking Christians having of the sex and I’m sorry if that was inferred.) But few of them actually came to the defense of porn.

Until this week when the post received this comment:

  1. I can not believe their is no christian porn. People need it in context of marriage instead of watching the trash from the secular community. Me and my husband like to watch each other on a video and would like to watch other detailed video of other people. There has to be a place for this. This is just not right. I fully believe that Jesus died for me and that is enough. I do not have to live in sexual immorality to watch some porn. All things are ok to do to those who walk in faith but to do but some things are not beneficial. Porn is very beneficial to me and my husband as a christian.

One question…

Should I delete all of my Christian Porn posts including this one? I like generating traffic and pulling new people into my conversations around here, but not all visitors are created equal.

Lots of Comments
Share This
Oct
25

“I can’t help everyone, but I can help some.”

By Kelsey

As much as I love meeting students at universities when I visit to speak, meeting the faculty is pretty cool too.

After a recent talk at West Texas A&M I had a chance to talk travel with a few faculty. One of the professors was a horse trainer who told a hilarious story about being invited to Saudi Arabia to judge racing camels. Another was Dr. James Hallmark, Provost/Vice President of Academic Affairs. James (we’re Facebook friends, so I’ll drop the formalities) told a rip-roaring tale about traveling in Turkey and how he thought he had been abducted by al Qaeda.

Following my visit, James wrote an editorial for the Amarillo Globe News about my visit. In Consider Where Our Clothes Are Made James writes this:

We have been blessed with much and much is expected of us. Is it too much to ask for us to consider how our clothes are made or to feed a hungry child?

Jesus’ statement “the poor you will have with you always” is an indictment of our selfishness more than a statement about the poor. We will always have the poor because those of us with means abdicate our responsibility to feed, clothe, shelter and educate the poor. We will always have the poor because governments like those in Somalia will prevent us from feeding the hungry in their own country.

I can’t help everyone, but I can help some.

My visit inspired James to write this and now his words have inspired me.

James message is one that I hope all the students I talked with walked away with. And it’s one to which we sing our baby boy Griffin to sleep every night.

Add a Comment
Share This
Sep
13

The profit will go somewhere

By Kelsey

If you buy this piece of crap, a percentage of the proceeds will go to helping orphaned puppies achieve their dreams of catching rainbows.

How much will go there and how will you know if I follow through with this? You can trust me. I’m a guy that loves orphaned puppies; how could you NOT trust me?

Shopping Greifportunities

This is my biggest beef with social entrepreneurs. Most of the time there is a complete lack of transparency and accountability.

The Colbert Report did a bit on “Shopping Greifportunities” last night with a focus on 9/11 stuff. You can buy 9/11 shoes, merlot, a chessboard with firefighters and police officers going at it, and even a dog collar (in dog years the tragedy was only 1 ½ years ago!).

The LA Times reports that the winery bottling the 9/11 wine donates 6-10% of the proceeds from the sale to the National September 11 Memorial and Museum.

“We’ve probably donated $25,000 from that wine,” said Gary Madden, general manager of the winery.

$25,000! That’s great!

But here’s what’s not so great: his use of the word “probably.” How do we know they donated anything? How much profit have they made off the wine? How much of a markup exists because of the 9/11 marketing angle?

The bottle retails for $19.11. Let’s say there is a 100% markup. That means the winery wholesales the wine for $9.55, but that isn’t their profit. Here’s a winery that wholesales a bottle for $12 and it costs them $7 to produce. If that same ratio applies to the 9/11 wine, one bottle sold equals a profit of $5.57. Six to ten percent of that is 33- to 56-cents.

Does it make sense to choose one product over another so 33- to 56-cents can go to a cause that you believe in?

Heck, I donate more than that ($1 to be precise) to kitties and puppies when I buy kitty litter at PetSmart.

There’s a fuzzy line between exploitation and social entrepreneurship. Every item that says, “proceeds will go to (insert cause here)” should come with a label saying exactly what that amount is. How else will we know if we are being taken advantage of as consumers and if a cause is being exploited to pad a company’s bottom line.

I’ve been asked if proceeds of my book go to any charity. The short answer is “No.”

But the long answer is that 4% of our family income goes to support local and global causes.

My income from a book sale is about $2. That means that for every copy sold, we donate 8-cents to a cause. That’s hardly worth bragging about. Maybe I can put a photo of my kids on the back cover of my book and write…

96% of the author’s royalties will go to feed his kids, save for college, pay down student loans, pay for his mortgage, car, gas, donuts, and the occasional case of beer.

Now that would be truth in marketing.

As Colbert says when he holds up his 9/11 commemorative eye-poking stick, “The profit will go somewhere.”

Here’s the whole Colbert bit…

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Shopping Griefportunities
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog Video Archive
Lots of Comments
Share This
Sep
5

Why do we hate teachers?

By Kelsey

Okay, maybe the title of the post is a bit inflammatory, but consider this excerpt from a recent column in the NYTimes by Charles Hill:

McGraw-Hill Research Foundation and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development found that one of the differences between the United States and countries with high-performing school systems was: “The teaching profession in the U.S. does not have the same high status as it once did, nor does it compare with the status teachers enjoy in the world’s best-performing economies.”

The report highlights two examples of this diminished status:

• “According to a 2005 National Education Association report, nearly 50 percent of new teachers leave the profession within their first five years teaching; they cite poor working conditions and low pay as the chief reason.”
• “High school teachers in the U.S. work longer hours (approximately 50 hours, according to the N.E.A.), and yet the U.S. devotes a far lower proportion than the average O.E.C.D. country does to teacher salaries.”

Low wages, poor working conditions, and long hours?

Are we talking about the garment industry here? We’re not exactly showering teachers with love and apples; more like disdain and tomatoes.

In Hill’s column he cites a recent poll that found that 76% of Americans believe high-achieving students should be recruited to be teachers and that 67% would like for their own child to become a teacher. Yet teachers and the education system as a whole continue to be criticized.

We rarely talk about high-performing teachers. Instead the conversation turns to mediocre and incompetent teachers who aren’t held accountable.

But here’s the thing…

It only takes one teacher to change the course of your life.

From kindergarten through college I had somewhere between 70 and 80 teachers. I probably can’t name half of them. And of the half I can remember, some I remember for not great reasons. But there are a select few I will never forget:

Mrs. Suitts, 3rd grade: She used to grab my ear, pull up, and walk me on my tiptoes out of her class. I was a bit of a class clown, but she believed in me. In 3rd grade I went from the lowest reading group to the highest. She even had me tested for the TAG (talented-and-gifted) program, to which I was admitted. Mrs. Suitts helped me realize that I had more to offer than the occasional class disruption.

Mrs. Birt, 5th grade: I wrote a story about a boy who found a pair of flying shoes. Mrs. Birt entered it into a contest in which I won honorable mention. More than that she encouraged me to write. I bumped into her at the county fair last year and she still uses some of my stories as examples in her class. There’s a moment in every writer’s story where someone steps into their life and says, “You can write!” Mrs. Birt was that person for me.

Mrs. Marshall, 11th & 12th grades: Poor Mrs. Marshall. By the time I reached her class I was on cruise control. I was all about the Cliff’s Notes and doing assignments the class period before they were due. She tried to start a summer reading program with myself and two of my classmates. We were supposed to have read “A Tale of Two Cities” by our first meeting. None of us did. Our lack of effort was disgusting and Mrs. Marshall’s efforts despite us were inspiring. I’ve since apologized to her many times and she still proofs my work to this day.

Jonathan Levy, Geology professor of Miami University: I took every class at Miami that Dr. Levy taught. One of them even required knowing calculus, which I did not. I missed every calculus question on every test and still got a B because Dr. Levy inspired me to study hard. Dr. Levy didn’t just talk about volcanoes, glaciers, caves, and plate tectonics, he showed us pictures of him exploring them. He taught me that learning begins in the classroom, but true knowledge can’t be gained from a book. When I decided to travel after college, I discussed my itinerary with Dr. Levy. Many of the places I visited on that first trip, I first saw in photos he had taken that he showed us in class.

If there is a more selfless profession than teaching others, year after year, something that you already know, I don’t know what it is.

On behalf of society, I apologize to all of the teachers out there. We don’t give you enough pay, time, or credit.

Preparing for Tomorrow

My sister-in-law, Emily Taylor, teaches kindergarten at Mississinawa Valley, my alma mater, and today, Labor Day, a day off, she’s at school in her classroom preparing for tomorrow.

Happy Labor Day teachers!

Think of three teachers who made a difference to you. Feel free to share who and why in the comments, but, more importantly, send your teachers a note of thanks.

“Teachers make a God-damned difference. What about you?”

YouTube Preview Image

Lots of Comments
Share This
Aug
22

“Poor” living like they just won a showcase showdown

By Kelsey

There’s this argument out there that poor people in the United State have stuff and that if you have stuff and are poor you aren’t living frugal enough. A recent segment on FOX News reported that 99.6% of those living in poverty have a fridge, 81.4% have a microwave, 78.3% have air conditioning, 63.7% have cable, 54.5% have cell phones, 48.6% have a coffee maker, 32.3% have two or more TVs, 25% have a dish washer.

The same folks making this argument would tell the poor to pull themselves up by the bootstraps. I’d like to make a couple of points.

  • If you don’t have a fridge, you have to eat out, which is more expensive.
  • If you don’t have a microwave, how do you cook a warm meal when the gas company shuts off your gas?
  • Just because your housing or public housing comes with air conditioning doesn’t mean you can afford to run it.
  • If you don’t have cable or Internet, how do you find jobs, apply for jobs, stay informed about the world?
  • If you don’t have a cell phone, how does a possible employer reach you. Even middle class folks have dropped their land lines. (Note: I’ve seen garment workers who earn $24/month chatting on cell phones. This aren’t the day of bag phones and $1/minute phone calls. Cell phones are a necessity.
  • When you’re raising three kids by yourself, you need some coffee.

I guess what I’m saying is that it’s hard to pull yourself up by your bootstraps when you ain’t got no bootstraps!

The Daily Show did a great piece on class warfare, but you can only watch it if you can afford a computer, electricity, and an Internet connection.

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
World of Class Warfare – The Poor’s Free Ride Is Over
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook
Lots of Comments
Share This
Aug
9

Radioactive Balls (yes, those kind of balls)

By Kelsey
Anti-radioactive-underwear

Hey baby, I'm radioactive-free Down There. My place or yours?

Do you carry your cell phone in your pocket? Do you Facebook with your laptop on your lap?

If you answered “Yeppers” to these questions, you could be suffering from radioactive balls. Radioactive balls can lead to impotence, infertility, and the the production of offspring with genetic mutations that give them superpowers for which society simultaneously loves and shuns them.

And it’s never easy being the parents of a superhero.

Batman’s parents = Dead
Superman’s biological parents = Dead
Superman’s earth parents = targets of evil geniuses
Spider-Man’s parents = Never heard from
Spider-Man’s Uncle = Shot

If impotence, infertility, and superhero parenting aren’t your thing, I’ve got just the pair of underwear for you. These special boxers are made with silver threads and deflect 99% of the radiation emitted by cell phones and laptops.

Introducing (drum roll)…..

SAFETY SHORTS!!!

Wait, they protect your balls from radiation and the best name they could come up with was Safety Shorts? One of the things I love most about my beat as an underwear journalist are the names of the underwear (i.e. Gas Eaters, OneDerWear). The name Safety Shorts seem like they should protect you from a nail gun not radiation.

I suggest a rename. How about…

Protect Your Balls from Radiation Boxers
Atomic Boxers
Enola Gay Underwear
No Glowing Balls Boxers
Anti-Godzilla Underwear
Silent But Not Deadly Boxers
Because Your Balls Shouldn’t Register on a Geiger Counter Boxers
There’s Nothing Hotter Than NOT Having a Radioactive Crotch Underwear
Well I’m not uptight, I’m not unattracted, Turn me on tonight because I’m radioactive (but my balls aren’t) Boxers

Okay, so some of these are more slogans than names, but I think you get my point.

Actually, I’m quite disappointed with the list of names. Can you do better?

What would you name a pair of boxers that protect a dude’s crotch from harmful radiation?

Here’s a little music to get your wheels turning.

Lots of Comments
Share This
Aug
4

Volunteer 2hrs/week & offset budget cuts from debt ceiling debate

By Kelsey

We live in tough times. Budgets are being slashed in households, cities, states, and our nation. Show me someone who hasn’t been impacted or had someone close to them impacted and I’ll show you a hermit with a billion bucks stuffed under his mattress.

With congress coming to terms at the last moment, the debt ceiling has been raised, but another $2.4 trillion of cuts are to be made over the next 10 years. $2.4 trillion seems like a lot, but it’s nothing that a nation of volunteers can’t make up for.

Let’s do the math:

$2,400,000,000,000 of cuts / 300 million Americans = $8,000 of cuts / person

1 hour of volunteering = $20

$8,000 of debt per person / $20 per volunteer hour = 400 hours per person

The cuts are two be carried out over a period of ten years, but if we divide our volunteering over four years…

400 hours volunteered per person / 2 years / 52 weeks = 1.92 volunteer hours per week.

Two hours! If every American volunteered only two hours each week for the next four years, the value of our service to one another would equal $2.4 trillion.

I know that the logic isn’t exactly that simple. Volunteers aren’t going to take on major infrastructure projects or maintain peace in a foreign land. But there are so many other ways we can contribute.

We could give back to our schools who are already struggling under shrinking budgets. My literary agent Caren is part of the Room to Write program, which encourages kids to read and write. Or we could become a mentor, which is a heck of a lot of fun and a proven way to keep youth out of prison. We could volunteer as EMTs or firefighters. Or we could find some other way to donate because volunteers are the new city employees.

Regardless of your politics, regardless if you think the cuts were too little or two much, a country of engaged citizens donating two or more hours per week would arguably have a larger economic impact than the loss of $2.4 trillion in government funds. Caren is getting kids excited about reading, which will yield better students able to solve tomorrow’s problems. The Leadership Board here in Muncie is championing mentoring, which ultimately leads to less crowded prisons and more productive citizens. What are you doing?

Will you pledge to volunteer two or more hours of your week for the next four years? Check out my Glocal Volunteer Resource to get started today.

One Comment
Share This
Aug
3

It’s. ALL. About. Empathy.

By Kelsey

Sam Richards
Sam Richards is a sociologist and teacher of the largest race relations course in the US. He argues that empathy is the core of sociology. Full bio here.

Add a Comment
Share This
Jul
28

Asking the wrong questions about TOMS Shoes

By Kelsey

Blake-Mycoskie-TOMS-Shoes-Focus on the family

I’m quoted in a LA Weekly story on TOMS shoes.

Since I’ve started to think about and research TOMS my stance has been best summed up as such: the problem isn’t shoelessness; it’s poverty.

At the best TOMS is addressing a symptom of poverty, not poverty itself. At the worst, TOMS is exploiting those living in poverty to sell shoes and hindering the local shoe business of their giving locations by giving away free shoes.

The author of the piece, Patrick McDonald, even gave me the last word on TOMS in the piece:

“You see the impact of how a job can change lives,” says Timmerman, “of how it can give a person dignity.”

He adds, “TOMS is a feel-good story, but you pull back the veil a little bit and you just go, ‘Oh, man, I really wish that’s not the case.’ ”

But it’s not the last word that makes me uneasy about this piece. It’s the first words. The piece is titled: “Is Blake Mycoskie an Evangelical?” (I knew that the business model of TOMS was being called into question when I granted the interview, but I didn’t know the hook was going to focus on the religious beliefs of TOMS’ founder.)

So what if he is?

From the LA Weekly story:

Christianity Today reporter Sarah Pulliam Bailey points out that, in the past, Mycoskie’s evangelical activity “hasn’t been a problem for him. But now, it is.”

She revealed July 10 that Mycoskie attends Mosaic, an L.A. evangelical Christian church that’s considered more multicultural than mainstream evangelical institutions.

Mycoskie also spoke at an official TOMS event at Abilene Christian University, an evangelical college that refused to allow formation of a gay-straight alliance; and at an evangelical Christian conference hosted by influential pastor Bill Hybels of Willow Creek Community Church, a megachurch that has promoted the idea that gays and lesbians should be celibate or seek therapy.

The whole “Blake is an evangelical Christian and evangelical Christians hate the gays” leap is a big one. Yes, there are churches and groups that are actively involved in the anti-gay rights movement, but it takes a pretty broad brush to say they ALL are — every single one of them — for praying away the gay. This whole issue blew up after Mycoskie spoke to Focus on the Family a group known for it’s strong anti-gay stance.

In response to the uproar Blake writes on his blog:

These past few weeks have been some of the most difficult of my life. When I accept an invitation for a public speaking engagement, my purpose is to share the TOMS story and our giving mission. In no way do I believe that this means I endorse every single aspect of the organization I am speaking to. That may be naïve, and you may disagree, but it is my sincere belief.

As someone who speaks all over the country to all kinds of groups, I agree with Blake. I’ve talked with groups whose worldviews are different than my own. In fact, I think it’s important to do this. Whether on stage or in life we shouldn’t isolate our interactions to those who only see the world exactly as we do. Otherwise – if we believe their views need changed – how will we change them?

I believe that gay rights is a human rights issue and not a faith one. But it doesn’t matter what I believe about gay rights because groups don’t bring me in to talk about it. To me it doesn’t matter what the groups politics or faith is, I have my message and I’m honored to deliver it. I suspect Blake is the same.

But the question about Blake shouldn’t be, “Is he an evangelical? It should be, “Can producing shoes in China for $2.50, selling those shoes to American consumers for $60 using the faces and feet of the world’s poor as a marketing agent, and giving an even cheaper pair of shoes away in Ethiopia, all while being a private company operating with the opacity with which that provides, an ethical way to do business or just a way to make lots of money? To me TOMS 1-for-1 model looks more like 1 for TOMS and .1 for those living in poverty.

Nike has more social accountability than TOMS. And all of this “Blake believes in Jesus so he must hate gay people” business is just distracting from what really matters…

People that have jobs can always buy shoes.

I’d like to see TOMS manufacture all of their shoes in factories that provide good jobs that put the workers’ kids through school and improve lives. If they did this, I would go from being the go-to-guy for quotes criticizing TOMS to one of the company’s biggest supporters.

That would be a business I would support, and, I don’t care what you believe, I’d tell you about it.

<i>Does this guy look like he'd be against gay rights?</i><b></b>

Does this guy look like he'd be against gay rights?

Lots of Comments
Share This
Jul
12

What do Indian call centers think of you?

By Kelsey

India call center

“Hello,” the heavily-accented voice on the line said, “this is T-Rex. How can I be of service to you today?”

I was calling about a credit card or maybe my website. I can’t remember for sure, but I needed help and had to place the dreaded call to customer service.

“T-Rex? Your name is T-Rex?”

“Yes, sir, like the dinosaur in Jurassic Park!”

I’m glad he clarified that because I might have thought he was referring to the British band and that would just be weird.

What’s your most memorable chat with India?

Andrew Marantz wrote an amazing piece in Mother Jones about Indian call centers. He actually worked in one!

On training:

For three weeks, a culture trainer will teach us conversational skills, Australian pop culture, and the terms of the mobile-phone contracts we’ll be peddling. Those of us who pass the training course will graduate to the calling floor. Our first job at DCC will be to interrupt Australians at dinner and ask them to switch phone providers.

trainees memorize colloquialisms and state capitals, study clips of Seinfeld and photos of Walmarts, and eat in cafeterias serving paneer burgers and pizza topped with lamb pepperoni.

I loved that Marantz puts lives to the voices fixing all of our problems over the phone from the other side of the globe.

Every month, thousands of Indians leave their Himalayan tribes and coastal fishing towns to seek work in business process outsourcing, which includes customer service, sales, and anything else foreign corporations hire Indians to do.

They will earn as much as 20,000 rupees per month—around $2 per hour, or $5,000 per year if they last that long, which most will not. In a country where per-capita income is about $900 per year, a BPO salary qualifies as middle-class. Most call-center agents, however, will opt to sleep in threadbare hostels, eat like monks, and send their paychecks home. Taken together, the millions of calls they make and receive constitute one of the largest intercultural exchanges in history.”

On his first day, Nishant donned his headset, dialed the number on the screen and was connected to a 60-year-old woman in Tennessee. She had an outstanding hospital bill for $400. “I told her, ‘Just pay this, what’s the problem?’ She told me, ‘You don’t understand, I can’t pay.’” They talked for 45 minutes, and the woman cried as she told Nishant about the Iraq War and its toll on American families. “By this time I’m crying also,” Nishant said.
The same day, he was connected with a man living in a trailer. “I told him, ‘What’s a trailer?’ He told me, ‘It’s this tin shed; it gets 90 degrees; we don’t have our own washroom.’” Nishant learned more about America that first day, he told me, than he had in his whole childhood.

“When do we get paid?” asked a young man wearing a Nike cap, yellow-tinted sunglasses, and carefully crafted facial stubble. In New York, I would have pegged him as a party promoter from Long Island City.
“Very funny,” Lekha said. “You’ll be paid for your time, including this training, but only after you’ve stayed two months. You know the drill: We wouldn’t want people taking off as soon as training is over.”

During our first cigarette break, Mr. Long Island City revealed that, indeed, his plan was to do precisely that—he’d already gone through this routine at some 15 BPOs around Delhi. “Who needs to stay for the actual work? Plus,” he added, flashing a salacious smile, “that way you meet more girls.”

Call-center employees gain their financial independence at the risk of an identity crisis. A BPO salary is contingent on the worker’s ability to de-Indianize: to adopt a Western name and accent and, to some extent, attitude. Aping Western culture has long been fashionable; in the call-center classroom, it’s company policy. Agents know that their jobs only exist because of the low value the world market ascribes to Indian labor. The more they embrace the logic of global capitalism, the more they must confront the notion that they are worth less.

Australians are dumb and Americans will just shout at you.

“Just stating facts, guys,” Lekha began, as we scribbled notes, “Australia is known as the dumbest continent. Literally, college was unknown there until recently. So speak slowly.” Next to me, a young man in a turban wrote No college in his notebook.
“Technologically speaking, they’re somewhat backward, as well. The average person’s mobile would be no better than, say, a Nokia 3110 classic.” This drew scoffs from around the room.

“Australians drink constantly,” Lekha continued. “If you call on a Friday night, they’ll be smashed—every time. Oh, and don’t attempt to make small talk with them about their pets, okay? They can be quite touchy about animals.”

“What kind of people are there in Australia?” a trainee asked. “What are their traits?”

“Well, for one thing,” Lekha said, “let’s admit: They are quite racist. They do not like Indians. Their preferred term for us is—please don’t mind, ladies—’brown bastards.’ So if you hear that kind of language, you can just hang up the call.”
..

“Americans will just shout at you,” Sube said. Mittu agreed: “I have only been cursed by Americans. They are sharp-witted and very articulated and yet very free with their anger.”

The call centers prep the BPOs for seven types of callers:

“First is your eccentric!” she yelled.
“Second is your arrogant!
“Third is your bumpkin!
“Fourth is your quarrelsome!
“Fifth is your prudent!
“Sixth is your assertive!
“And seventh is your sweet-spoken!

What kind of caller are you? After reading this piece you might have a little more empathy for the Indian operator on the other end.

—-

And now a message from the other T-Rex!

YouTube Preview Image
Lots of Comments
Share This
Loading Quotes...
©2009–2012 Kelsey Timmerman
All Rights Reserved.
Contact Kelsey hi@kelseytimmerman.com

Bookmark the RSS feed
Sign Up for email updates